Group A presents evidence showing the United States and its entire political system as anathema to the interests of the greater part of humanity, and comes to the conclusion that, because it is beyond repair, steps must be taken outside of the system in order to enact meaningful change.
Meanwhile, group B offers similar (or even the same) evidence, and amazingly comes to the opposite conclusion - that we can still work within the system, and everything could be salvaged if only we were to vote the right people into office.
Now, who exactly are the radicals, the crazies - those who espouse opinions that no reasonable person could ever accept?
Previous Thoughtcrime Next Thoughtcrime
No comments:
Post a Comment