Thoughtcrime - 22 Apr 2013

Why is it when a business provides a service that is cheaper for itself to maintain, yet more costly for the public to access, it is seen as a positive development?  Should it not cause more outrage when the costs of doing business are shifted onto the consumer, who in reality has little to no recourse?

Previous Thoughtcrime                                                                                      Next Thoughtcrime

No comments:

Post a Comment